Comments on: My take on the GLAM-wiki recommendations http://catherinestyles.com/2009/10/15/glam-wiki-recommendations/ ...on doing and being, in a digitally-enhanced way Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:42:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Part 1: Making Wikipedia “GLAM-friendly” | Witty’s Blog http://catherinestyles.com/2009/10/15/glam-wiki-recommendations/#comment-87 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:52:50 +0000 http://catherinestyles.com/?p=414#comment-87 [...] with the National Archives of Australia at the time of the conference has recently published her personal response to the recommendations and they are awesome. They point out that in many cases Wikimedians would love to help and do [...]

]]> By: Craig http://catherinestyles.com/2009/10/15/glam-wiki-recommendations/#comment-86 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:13:17 +0000 http://catherinestyles.com/?p=414#comment-86 Hi Cath,

Thanks for this thought-provoking post. As a Wikimedian, it’s encouraging and positive to see that to a very large degree, GLAM institutions are more or less thinking the same things we are! I’m particularly interested in your suggestions on how we can meet your (as in, the GLAM sector’s) recommendations on Law – my experience has been that there are good answers to these points that we can provide when in person, but we probably need to get better at stimulating discussion and thought in GLAM institutions about this. This is definitely something that WMAU and Wikimedians generally should take on board.

- Craig

]]>